- Digikam face metadata install#
- Digikam face metadata archive#
- Digikam face metadata software#
- Digikam face metadata download#
One example is Jose Oliver-Didier and his blog. Sometimes, this results in an application actually deleting image metadata!Įxperts with specific domain knowledge have weighed in on the discussion. This means syncing up the IPTC and EXIF fields with corresponding fields in XMP – but who determines what those corresponding fields might be? Currently, there isn’t a standard or an independent organization helping to develop one. Because many applications are unable to recognize XMP, image files still need to contain the IPTC and EXIF info. IPTC and EXIF have been around the longest, while XMP is a relatively new standard and generally viewed as the future of metadata. The three formats include IPTC, EXIF, and XMP. This is mainly due to the fact that there are three image metadata formats but no industry standards to guide how these formats sync up in various applications. Spend some time trying to understand image metadata formats and how they are treated by various applications will quickly have your head spinning. It seems Lightroom (also Classic) is now only available as part of the subscription from Adobe, so I don't think I'd use that for my home photos.Tag That Photo Offers Cross-Application Image Metadata Compatibility
Digikam face metadata download#
When I download portrait positioned face tagged photo from the NAS (PhotoStation) and open them in DigiKam, then the face rectangles are not on the correct places (I'm not sure which program to blame). And there seems to be some kind of incompatibility between them, when it comes to automatically rotated photos ("portrait" with highest sides on the Y axes), taken with camera.
Digikam face metadata install#
I've tried the two programs above but neither of them is as simple as MS Photo Gallery (that is no longer supported, and a bit hard to install even if it's possible). I've still not decided what to use for myself, so that's the reason for me being here. I've not tried any automatic recognition in the above that may be possible, perhaps not in both of them. I'm primarily concerned about the possibility to add people tags manually, and stored in the same way as Windows Photo Gallery. (Check this checkbox to let digiKam write the face data into the files.)Īlso, if you've got a Synology NAS, there is Photo Station 6, with face tagging, storing as XMP. You just need to configure digiKam so that the XMP data is stored inside the files:Ĭonfigure / Metadata / Behaviour / Face Tags (including face areas) People tagging is present, stored as XMP regions. Here are two more programs that may fit into your nice overview table above.ĭigiKAM (OpenSource, free).
Digikam face metadata software#
So other software can at least find what it likes to find, in one of them.
Digikam face metadata archive#
I want software that helps me write the above metadata for my archive to XMP, IIM, and EXIF's related locations. just naming people in Picture as tags.)įace Tags (XMP's standard face tags. Tags or Keywords ( a fail-safe alternative to true face tag info.
Description (a short description of the story of the image if available).same as above it seems to be stored in EXIF and I need to be able to manually add it to some images) Location (The Location the image was taken.so I need to manually enter this info for them.) some of my pictures are scanned old photos. What I ultimately want is to have this metadata in my pictures: EXIF, IPTC's IIM and Metadata Working Group's XMP.Īs you see, each photo editing/organizing software is literally choosing what it likes to read.Īnd about face tags, the only way to store them correctly is in XMP. We seem to have three standards regarding embedding metadata into image files themselves. Since I read this great blog post from Carl Seibert I found out that embedded Picture Metadata world is a Hell. These past three days were a nightmare to me as I was trying to find THE way to store picture metadata for my 5000 photo archive the correct way.
0 kommentar(er)
